<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>e-learning Now &#187; 3D Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drandyoliver.edublogs.org/category/3d-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drandyoliver.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>Andrew Oliver's blog on social web tools in education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Where are we going? Let’s talk about Web 3.0 and Web 4.0.</title>
		<link>http://drandyoliver.edublogs.org/2008/10/17/where-are-we-going-let%e2%80%99s-talk-about-web-30-and-web-40/</link>
		<comments>http://drandyoliver.edublogs.org/2008/10/17/where-are-we-going-let%e2%80%99s-talk-about-web-30-and-web-40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drandyoliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 4.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drandyoliver.edublogs.org/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Currently we’re in the middle of web 2.0 in which the internet is characterised as being ‘read/write’ In other words you can not only read web content but you can also add your own content to the web as well. Example technology includes wikis, blogs, shared content (YouTube, Flickr) and of course social networks (Facebook). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently we’re in the middle of web 2.0 in which the internet is characterised as being ‘read/write’ In other words you can not only read web content but you can also add your own content to the web as well. Example technology includes wikis, blogs, shared content (YouTube, Flickr) and of course social networks (Facebook). So we’re in a social environment, (web 1.0 incidentally is what we now call the first incarnation of the web in which web content was ‘read only’ – oh and another my interpretation of web 2.0 is very loose – its based on current (mis)conceptions of the term, for the real visit O’Reilly media to see how the term originated, (What Is Web 2.0 &#8211; <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html" target="_blank">Web Link</a>).</p>
<p>Anyway Web 3.0 is apparently just around the corner (2010 &#8211; see Nova Spivack&#8217;s timeline below). Also known as the ‘Intelligent web’ or the ‘semantic web’ this current incarnation is even to be an evolution on the previous in which the web becomes more intelligent in the way it looks for and receives information – it does a lot of work for you, (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web" target="_blank">Good Old Wikipedia Definition</a>). And because it has not arrived yet there’s no fixed definition. Indeed around a year ago I recall the next step upward from Web 2.0 as being ‘3D web’ which encapsulates virtual world elments into browser, Photosynth is a good example (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosynth" target="_blank">Web Link</a>).</p>
<p>To be honest I’m more interested in the notion of Web 4.0 which is predicted by Nova Spivack at Radar Technologies to arrive around the year 2020 (How the WebOS Evolves? &#8211; <a href="http://novaspivack.typepad.com/nova_spivacks_weblog/2007/02/steps_towards_a.html" target="_blank">Web Link</a> and the image below). At present Web 4.0 is characterised by intelligent personal agents which in our current context could be represented by the people patterns and profile elements that Amazon use to recommend purchases. In terms of education and e-learning we might be seeing a situation in which the student progresses along a learning pathway not only influenced by their degree/tutors but also by who they know, their interests, career objectives, progression in particular subjects etc. And I think this might not be too far off.</p>
<p><a href="http://novaspivack.typepad.com/RadarNetworksTowardsAWebOS.jpg" target="_blank">Click here to see the Nova Spivack time line</a></p>
<p>The key question is however how (if possible) could this be accommodated to achieve a sound education, (in particular I’m also thinking of how this relates to the notion of ‘pedagogy 2.0’ in my previous post)?</p>
<p>And another issue is what if the agents get it wrong? For example I’ve recently bought book on dog breeding as a one-off present only to find that Amazon now continually throws similar book items to me.</p>
<p>And web 4.0, if truly embodied by people patterns, also runs the risk of trapping you into a constricted pathway.</p>
<p>Susan Smith Nash sums this up in her blog post (Web 3.0, Web 4.0 and Personal Agents: Will They Open or Restrict Choice? &#8211; <a href="http://elearnqueen.blogspot.com/2008/10/web-30-web-40-and-personal-agents-will.html" target="_blank">Web Link</a> ). She defines web 4.0: “Web 4.0 will, in theory, include an array of sensors that will gather information from one&#8217;s environment and use them to create a deep profile of your behaviours and activities.” So there are learning potentials here.</p>
<p>However she also observes “However, will you be held hostage to your old patterns? Will the information actually restrict your options?”. An important point as web 4.0 might not be too appealing. She ends with a warning “Clearly, the tendency in the future might be to simply repeat and reinforce what one already knows, with expansions, revisions, and tightening focus. The ability to branch out and think about obscure, unrelated, even random things can and will be seriously constricted in the world of Web 4.0 as envisioned now.”.</p>
<p>As my fellow cell mate Ian says: ‘If web 2.0 is defined as user generated content, then is web 4.0 content generated users?’</p>
<p>As always happy to receive comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drandyoliver.edublogs.org/2008/10/17/where-are-we-going-let%e2%80%99s-talk-about-web-30-and-web-40/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A different view of the web</title>
		<link>http://drandyoliver.edublogs.org/2007/06/27/a-different-view-of-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://drandyoliver.edublogs.org/2007/06/27/a-different-view-of-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drandyoliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drandyoliver.edublogs.org/2007/06/27/a-different-view-of-the-web/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More Photosynth. In the architect, Blaise Aguera Y Arcas, own words (more or less) Photosynth links photos together. Basically when you take 2 photos in a common environment it is as if you form a hyperlink between them. This notion is extended to the vision of an emergent network of hyperlinked photos being built by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More Photosynth. In the architect, Blaise Aguera Y Arcas, own words (more or less) Photosynth links photos together. Basically when you take 2 photos in a common environment it is as if you form a hyperlink between them. This notion is extended to the vision of an emergent network of hyperlinked photos being built by web crawlers. Interestingly you can navigate between images on the basis of content similarity rather than any tagged data.</p>
<p><code><object width="" height=""><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p16frKJLVi0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p16frKJLVi0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="" height=""></embed></object></code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drandyoliver.edublogs.org/2007/06/27/a-different-view-of-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web 3D on the way?</title>
		<link>http://drandyoliver.edublogs.org/2007/06/27/web-3d-on-the-way/</link>
		<comments>http://drandyoliver.edublogs.org/2007/06/27/web-3d-on-the-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>drandyoliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[3D Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaverse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Worlds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drandyoliver.edublogs.org/2007/06/27/web-3d-on-the-way/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attaching 3D models to Google Earth has been achievable for a while. It’s interesting since to you can ‘fly’ though cities, explore spaces etc. Its adoption has been somewhat sporadic but recently the city of Berlin released around 44,000 3D building models (approx 10 percent of the city). The video below is essentially a recorded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attaching 3D models to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_earth" target="_blank">Google Earth</a> has been achievable for a while. It’s interesting since to you can ‘fly’ though cities, explore spaces etc. Its adoption has been somewhat sporadic but recently the city of Berlin released around 44,000 3D building models (approx 10 percent of the city). The video below is essentially a recorded tour.</p>
<p><code><object width="" height=""><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lkTMMJZI65M"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lkTMMJZI65M" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="" height=""></embed></object></code></p>
<p> Not sure how the buildings were designed but I suspect through using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sketchup" target="_blank">Sketchup</a>. This effectively allows you to create models and insert them on to Google Earth.</p>
<p>Staying with virtual earths here’s an interesting TED talk by Stephen Lawler on the beta Virtual Earth. It streams a vast amount of rich data provided by the web community.</p>
<p>As an aside it’s worth noting as to how the speaker is able to pack so much information into the presentation in such a short space of time.</p>
<p><code><object width="" height=""><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SuWH0ETXTfE"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SuWH0ETXTfE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="" height=""></embed></object></code></p>
<p> In the words of Stephen the key issue here is how the user is able to use their brain, to navigate and explore, discover information as opposed to being constrained through traditional browsing via search engines, remembering urls and favorites. This could be the future look of the internet.</p>
<p>As a final point of interest you may not need a vast array of photos or data to create 3D navigable web objects. <a href="http://www.fotowoosh.com/" target="_blank">Photowoosh</a> allows you to create a 3D model from a single photograph, similar to a pop up book page. Imagine the kinds of virtual projects as student can produce using this kind of software all from one image.</p>
<p><code><object width="" height=""><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nPt7GmIpXo8"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nPt7GmIpXo8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="" height=""></embed></object></code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://drandyoliver.edublogs.org/2007/06/27/web-3d-on-the-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
